🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, intimidating phone calls recurred. At first, reportedly from a retired cop and an ex-military commander, later from the police themselves. Ultimately, a local artisan asserts he was summoned to the local precinct and told clearly: stop speaking out or face serious consequences.

Shaikh is among those opposing a high-value redevelopment plan where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be bulldozed and redeveloped by a large business group.

"The distinctive community of this area is exceptional in the globe," says Shaikh. "But the plan aims to destroy our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of this community stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Homes are assembled randomly and typically without proper sanitation, unregulated industries emit toxic smoke and the air is permeated by the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the vision of Dharavi transformed into a glistening neighborhood of premium apartments, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and homes with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream realized.

"We don't have proper healthcare, roads or sewage systems and we have no places for youth to recreate," explains a chai seller, fifty-six, who relocated from southern India in that period. "The only way is to clear the area and provide modern residences."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, such as the leather artisan, are resisting the redevelopment.

All recognize that Dharavi, long neglected as informal housing, is desperately requiring investment and development. Yet they are concerned that this plan – lacking community input – could potentially transform premium city property into an elite enclave, evicting the disadvantaged, immigrant populations who have been there since the late 1800s.

It was these shunned, displaced people who established the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose economic value is estimated at between $1m and a substantial sum per year, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Of the roughly 1 million inhabitants living in the dense 220-hectare neighborhood, a minority will be qualified for replacement housing in the development, which is projected to take seven years to accomplish. Others will be relocated to undeveloped zones and coastal regions on the remote edges of the metropolis, threatening to break up a long-established social network. Some will not get housing at all.

People eligible to continue living in the area will be given apartments in multi-story structures, a substantial change from the organic, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has sustained this area for many years.

Commercial activities from garment work to clay work and waste processing are likely to decrease in quantity and be moved to an allocated "commercial zone" separated from people's residences.

Survival Challenge

In the case of this protester, a leather artisan and third generation of his family to reside in Dharavi, the project presents an existential threat. His informal, multi-level workshop creates apparel – tailored coats, luxury coats, fashionable garments – sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and overseas.

Relatives dwells in the rooms underneath and employees and tailors – migrants from different regions – also sleep in the same building, permitting him to sustain operations. Outside the slum, Mumbai rents are typically 10 times costlier for a single room.

Pressure and Coercion

Within the government offices nearby, a visual representation of the redevelopment plan illustrates a very different perspective. Well-groomed residents gather on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing international baked goods and pastries and enlisting beverages on a patio outside Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. This depicts a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains local residents.

"This represents no improvement for residents," states the artisan. "It represents an enormous real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for us to survive."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the business conglomerate. Headed by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a supporter of the government head – the business group has faced accusations of crony capitalism and questionable practices, which it rejects.

Even as local authorities describes it as a joint project, the business group contributed a significant amount for its 80% stake. A lawsuit alleging that the initiative was improperly granted to the business group is under review in the top court.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to actively protest the development, Shaikh and other residents state they have been experienced an extended period of pressure and threats – involving messages, explicit warnings and insinuations that speaking against the development was comparable with speaking against the country – by people they allege represent the business conglomerate.

Part of the group accused of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c