🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes added later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.